
Both are available for around ten pounds and are both wines that I've tried before and like. The Cissac has lovely rich fruit, some sour cherry and a little basil and black pepper on the nose. There is also some menthol creeping through as well. A concentrated palate, more sour cherry, leathery tannins and a nice herby flavour with a dusting of cocoa. The finish is a little short and dusty, but this is drinking so well. 8/10
The American wine proclaims itself as the "Incredible Red", and it is a full on oak fest. Juicy cherry and lots of strawberries. Slightly confected nose, a bit of marshmallow, and then lots of raspberry and cranberry juice. The palate is all cranberry, a little cherry bubblegum and quite a bit of alcohol. That softens though, and the finish is chocolatey with just a little confected strawberries on the finish. 7/10
The Cissac went pretty well with the meal. It certainly isn't a 'sit down on the sofa and drink it while watching a movie' wine (despite the fact that I polished off the bottle later). It's herby, slightly leathery character matched well with the caramelised steak juices. The Zinfandel however didn't. It was far too fruity, so soft and totally unbalanced with the food, it needed some depth which it was just lacking. It's not a bad wine, but the confected elements were exaggerated by the savoury elements of the meal making it almost sickly. The oak also clashed terribly with the baked potato. I was once at a champagne dinner and the chef decided to make mashed potato with vanilla seeds through it. The combination of the vanilla oak and the potato reminded me of that.
I had two good wines, that I've had before and enjoyed. When I tasted them before dinner my previous opinions were reiterated. However, paired with my dinner one worked very well, one totally tanked!
Comments